Monday, February 10, 2014

First You Love It, Next you Don't - Tattoo Removal

A tattoo is supposed to be permanent. Unfortunately, what a person may desire today may not be what he or she wants two or twenty years from now. Both the procedure of and price of getting a tattoo are relatively minor compared to having it removed in the future. It may be advisable to take into cosideration the facts before visiting a nearby tattoo artist with design and cash in hand.
Natural tattoo removal
Two of the most very popular techniques for removing an unwanted tattoo are also two of the most unsatisfactory. The first method involves removing a piece of skin coming from a less-noticeable part of your body, and grafting it on top of the tattoo. This odd kind of "plastic surgery" covers up the tattoo, but generally leaves tissue scarring, as the skin is not in its normal state. Another popular way is just to make an appointment with tattoo artist and have another design tattooed on top of the unwanted one. By way of this method, the black outline from the original tattoo will be noticeable through the new one; having a much larger the first, and the greater amount of black ink it has, the more difficult it will be to cover it.
Natural tattoo removal
A surgical method which is equally if not more unsatisfactory is called dermabrasion. In layman's terms, you can consider it as going at your skin with sandpaper. Even when the epilfree solution is performed by a licensed physician, you'll probably decide that the resulting scar is worse than the original tattoo. The rationale when it comes to the scarring is that removing a tattoo by this method means getting through the tattoo and the underlying skin. The scarring left by this method will leave that small portion your epidermis a much lighter color and a different texture than the surrounding skin. Of all tattoo removal methods currently in practice, dermabrasion is the method which will leave the most noticeable scarring.

LOOKING FOR ANOTHER TREATMENT? 
Excision rarely presents a satisfactory alternative, either. As its name implies, the excision method of tattoo removal consists of having the tattoo surgically cut out of the skin, and the surrounding skin then sewed back together. The scar may not be as noticeable as one from the dermabrasion method, but the rather gruesome excision procedure itself more than makes up the difference in terms of a procedure which you will probably not like going through.
Natural tattoo removal
A large selection of creams are sold for tattoo removal. Tattoo artists claim that they are a waste of money and time, as they fail to work. Whatever new concoction is sold under the guise of being a sure method of eliminating a tattoo, a potential customer ought to keep in mind that since the tattoo is not simply on the top of the skin but deep into its layers, over-the-counter creams sold for this purpose will do little if any good. The chemical substance peel method which uses trichloroacetic acid produces some extent of results, as it actually removes the layers of the skin.
Natural tattoo removal
Currently, the use of lasers is one of the most common methods of tattoo removal. It is not as simple as it may sound, however. First, depending on size and details of the artwork, removal by laser can take up to ten sessions in order to achieve a degree of results. One source states that each session can cost between $250-$850 per session. It has been said that the laser removal method can be quite painful.

The latest tattoo removal method is Intense Pulsated Light Therapy. Although it is said to be to be less painful, and produces better results than removal by laser, it is also much more expensive.

LOOKING FOR ANOTHER TREATMENT? 

Back at it!

Hello Tattoo Removal Peeps!

Well, after taking almost two years off of the removal process, I'm back at it! I didn't intend to take so much time off, but with my graduate work and actual work, I didn't have the time nor money to continue at the pace I was going. No worries though, they picked me up right where I left off. They didn't charge extra, raise the price, nor require a new consultation, so I was super stoked at how easy it was. I had another treatment last Thursday (February 6th). It was the same as the last time as far as the laser for tattoo removal goes. The ruby laser and then they did two passes on it, which they zap it all once and then go over the same area and zap it again. The only difference was that this time they also incorporated a second laser for skin resurfacing, which is to promote collagen growth and improve the overall look of the skin. This was oddly painful! As I mentioned, they had already done two passes with the ruby laser, which targets the ink and when it hits your skin it's like a pop, but you don't feel like it's penetrating too deep. The laser skin resurfacing laser literally cuts holes in your skin, and that's exactly what it felt like. Mind you, they gave me injections of local anesthesia prior to the ruby laser, and then in between the laser switch, they rubbed numbing cream on the area. I am sure it helped on some level, but I could feel that thing burning holes into my skin in a row of about twenty holes each time they swept the laser across my arm. It felt like I was being sawed with a laser because I could feel it cutting the tissue, which is unlike the tattoo lasers, which feel like a pop on the surface or mildly penetrating. I would later go on to read that when they do the laser skin resurfacing for other areas such as the face they use general anesthesia to put people under, which makes sense, because I was highly anesthetized and I could still feel it pretty intensely :( By the way, they did two passes of it, so not only did I feel it once but I had to suffer it again. Though it may seem awful, I can see how it will be worth it, as my removal treatments have left my skin damaged. I'm not sure if it is due to poor aftercare on my part or what, but I had tiny holes in the skin that once applied with cover-up, such as makeup, would get filled in and take a couple days to get it out of there. See below:
Sorry for the low quality on these images, they were taken a year ago, and I think was just trying to capture it for my own viewing, as I didn't have the blog in mind. But I think you get the point!

So I'm grateful to be tackling this aspect of it, as it will make it easier down the road to cover anything up if I want a flawless look. The thing to note about this procedure is that only medical doctors (dermatologists and plastic surgeons) can perform this procedure, so you have to go to one of those clinics. Luckily I do, so they can do it at the same time, and it really didn't cost anything extra. Super bonus!!!


So let's look at where I was prior to this treatment (number........?? oops, I lost count!) the day of and the day before February 6th, 2014:

 
In my opinion, there was still A LOT of ink, but everyone would say the opposite when they looked at it. That's why I like these pics, because they really pick up on what I see up close.

So, that's where I am at currently. I'll post pics of the healing process with these two lasers, because it really looks different than anything before. Here's a preview:



Here you can really see how the resurfacing laser burned a bunch of holes in the skin. They didn't blister really at all, just a bunch of tiny scabs, which develop over the next few days to look a little more intense. It's definitely more red than previous times as well. 


***Update***     It's treatment number 14.....wow!!!!